AMD Radeon Pro 575X versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 575X and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 140.3 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 85.3x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 24
- 7.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35017 versus 4657
- 6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11237 versus 1870
- 6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11237 versus 1870
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3458 versus 1596
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3458 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3309
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3309
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 March 2019 versus 1 September 2017 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 140.3 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 24 |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35017 versus 4657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3309 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35017 | 4657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3309 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 575X | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 18 March 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 391 | 1234 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 140.3 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5700 million | 189 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 217.6 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Quick Sync |