AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP und AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 53% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 3.5x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Startdatum | 15 October 2018 vs 13 August 2018 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Etwa 3% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1200 MHz vs 1168 MHz
- Etwa 19% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1530 MHz vs 1284 MHz
- Etwa 81% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 7708
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 661
- 2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69812 vs 34838
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 171.616 vs 115.237
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 vs 1890.261
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.925 vs 10.121
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 149.333
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1195.863 vs 614.542
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13044 vs 9258
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3709
- 9.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3351
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13044 vs 9258
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3709
- 9.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3351
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1200 MHz vs 1168 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1530 MHz vs 1284 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 vs 7708 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 vs 661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 vs 34838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 vs 115.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 vs 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 vs 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 vs 149.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 vs 614.542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3351 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7708 | 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 | 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34838 | 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 4031.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 16.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | 247.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 30936 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3782 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 4.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Codename | Polaris 20 | Vega 10 |
Startdatum | 15 October 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 335 | 118 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $999 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $999 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1284 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1168 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt | 230 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,700 million | 12,500 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz | 2000 MHz |