AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP und NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 16% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1168 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Etwa 7% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1284 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Etwa 67% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3652
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3290
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3652
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3290
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 15 October 2018 vs 13 August 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1168 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1284 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3290 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 7711
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 662
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 137262 vs 34856
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 115.237
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 1890.261
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 10.121
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 149.333
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 614.542
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 9258
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 9258
Spezifikationen | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 vs 7711 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 vs 662 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137262 vs 34856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 vs 115.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 vs 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 vs 149.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 614.542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 9258 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7711 | 19370 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 662 | 869 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34856 | 137262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 6432.348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 43.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | 215.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | 2101.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3290 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3782 | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
Codename | Polaris 20 | TU102 |
Startdatum | 15 October 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 335 | 103 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1284 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1168 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,700 million | 18,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz | 14000 MHz |