AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1168 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1284 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3290
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 7711
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 662
- 3.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 137262 versus 34856
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 115.237
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 1890.261
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 10.121
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 149.333
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 614.542
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 9258
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 9258
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 7711 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 662 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137262 versus 34856 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 115.237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 1890.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 10.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 149.333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 614.542 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 9258 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7711 | 19370 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 662 | 869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34856 | 137262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | 401.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 6432.348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 43.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | 215.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | 2101.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3290 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3782 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 335 | 103 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
AMDFirePro W9000
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
