Intel HD Graphics 520 vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel HD Graphics 520 und AMD Radeon R4 Graphics Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 520
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 867 vs 337
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 210 vs 99
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 4.721
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.083 vs 107.613
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 vs 0.445
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 vs 10.612
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 vs 13.097
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 951 vs 701
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 1338
- Etwa 84% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 1811
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 951 vs 701
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 1338
- Etwa 84% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 1811
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 September 2015 vs 11 June 2014 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 867 vs 337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 vs 99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 vs 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 vs 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 vs 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 vs 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 vs 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 1811 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 2.7x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 128 vs 24
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 3991
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 128 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 vs 3991 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 867 | 337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 | 99 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3991 | 8386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 1811 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Generation 9.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Codename | Skylake GT2 | Beema |
Startdatum | 1 September 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1394 | 1547 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1050 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 24 | 128 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | 930 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 204.8 gflops | |
Texturfüllrate | 6.4 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Speichertyp | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | System Shared |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync |