Intel HD Graphics 520 versus AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 867 versus 337
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 210 versus 99
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 4.721
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.083 versus 107.613
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 versus 0.445
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 versus 10.612
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 versus 13.097
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 951 versus 701
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 versus 1338
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 versus 1811
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 951 versus 701
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 versus 1338
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 versus 1811
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 11 June 2014 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 867 versus 337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 versus 99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 versus 4.721 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 versus 107.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 versus 0.445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 versus 10.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 versus 13.097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 versus 701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 versus 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 1811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 versus 701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 versus 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 1811 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 5.3x plus de pipelines: 128 versus 24
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 versus 3991
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 128 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 versus 3991 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 867 | 337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 | 99 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3991 | 8386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 4.721 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 107.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 0.445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 10.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 13.097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 1811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 1811 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | Beema |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1394 | 1547 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 128 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 930 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 204.8 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | System Shared |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 520 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Go
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8400
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710A
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
