Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel HD Graphics 630 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 630
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 10.7x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 64 GB vs 6 GB
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 vs 19.803
| Spezifikationen | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 vs 19.803 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- 4.3x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1506 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Etwa 49% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1708 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 4.8x mehr Texturfüllrate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- 53.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1280 vs 24
- 9.7x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 4,275 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- 7.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 vs 1114
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 268
- 6.8x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 31098 vs 4554
- 4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 vs 27.948
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 vs 312.246
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 vs 1.795
- 15.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 32.567
- 6.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 1859
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3654 vs 1945
- 6.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 1859
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3654 vs 1945
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3677 vs 388
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1506 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1708 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 1280 vs 24 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 4,275 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 vs 1114 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31098 vs 4554 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 vs 27.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 vs 312.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 vs 1.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 vs 32.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 vs 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 vs 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 vs 388 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 8160 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 444 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 31098 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 111.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 1371.266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 8.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 19.803 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 509.222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 12645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 3654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 12645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 3654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 | 3677 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GP106B |
| Startdatum | 30 August 2016 | 15 August 2016 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1216 | 385 |
| Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $229.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1150 MHz | 1708 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 441.6 gflops | 4,275 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 24 | 1280 |
| Texturfüllrate | 27.6 GTexel / s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | 4,400 million |
| CUDA-Kerne | 1280 | |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 94 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop-Größe | large | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 64 GB | 6 GB |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Speichertyp | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | 0 |
| Speicherbandbreite | 192 GB / s | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 8008 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| Surround | ||
| Virtuelle Realität | ||
| VR Ready | ||

