Intel HD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 120 Watt
- 10.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 versus 19.803
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 versus 19.803 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- 4.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 49% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 133.6 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s
- 53.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 24
- 9.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,275 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- 7.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 versus 1114
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 versus 268
- 6.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 31098 versus 4554
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 versus 27.948
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 versus 312.246
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 versus 1.795
- 15.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 versus 32.567
- 6.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 versus 1859
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3654 versus 1945
- 6.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 versus 1859
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3654 versus 1945
- 9.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3677 versus 388
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 133.6 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 versus 1114 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 versus 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31098 versus 4554 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 versus 27.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 versus 312.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 versus 1.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 versus 32.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 versus 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 versus 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 versus 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 versus 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 versus 388 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 8160 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 444 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 31098 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 111.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 1371.266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 8.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 19.803 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 509.222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 12645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 3654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 12645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 3654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 | 3677 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GP106B |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 15 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1216 | 385 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
| Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1708 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 4,275 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 4,400 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 6 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| Surround | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 350M
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5200 Ultra
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9600 TX
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
