Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel UHD Graphics 620 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 10 Monat(e) später
- 5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 8x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 32 GB vs 4 GB
Startdatum | 1 September 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- 4.6x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Etwa 21% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1392 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 32x mehr Leitungssysteme: 768 vs 24
- 6.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 1042
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 241
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 4592
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 27.062
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 273.504
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 1.777
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 vs 19.939
- 9.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 31.881
- 6.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 1397
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 878
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 2227
- 6.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 1397
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 878
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 2227
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 vs 62
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1392 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 768 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 vs 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 vs 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 vs 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 vs 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 vs 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 vs 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 vs 62 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 305 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GP107 |
Startdatum | 1 September 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1380 | 487 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $139 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $159.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1150 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 24 | 768 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA-Kerne | 768 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,138 gflops | |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 97 °C | |
Texturfüllrate | 66.82 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 145 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertyp | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | 0 |
Speicherbandbreite | 112 GB / s | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7 GB/s | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |