Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• 4.6x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
• 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 1042
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 241
• 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 4592
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 27.062
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 273.504
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 1.777
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 vs 19.939
• 9.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 31.881
• 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 2227
• 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 2227
• 4.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 650
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 305

Compare specifications (specs)