Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 4 GB

Date de sortie	1 September 2017 versus 25 October 2016
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt versus 75 Watt
Taille de mémore maximale	32 GB versus 4 GB

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

4.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1392 MHz versus 300 MHz
Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1392 MHz versus 1150 MHz
32x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 24
6.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 versus 1042
2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 versus 241
4.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 versus 4592
2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 27.062
3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 versus 273.504
2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 1.777
Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 versus 19.939
9.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 31.881
6.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 1397
4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 versus 878
Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 versus 2227
6.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 1397
4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 versus 878
Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 versus 2227
4.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 versus 62

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1392 MHz versus 300 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1392 MHz versus 1150 MHz
Pipelines	768 versus 24
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	6332 versus 1042
PassMark - G2D Mark	650 versus 241
Geekbench - OpenCL	20732 versus 4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	75.758 versus 27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	843.503 versus 273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.071 versus 1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.676 versus 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	301.168 versus 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496 versus 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3687 versus 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3336 versus 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496 versus 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3687 versus 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3336 versus 2227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	305 versus 62

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1042

6332

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

241

650

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4592

20732

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.062

75.758

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

273.504

843.503

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.777

5.071

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.939

24.676

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.881

301.168

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1397

8496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

878

3687

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

3336

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1397

8496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

878

3687

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

3336

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

305

Nom	Intel UHD Graphics 620	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark	1042	6332
PassMark - G2D Mark	241	650
Geekbench - OpenCL	4592	20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.062	75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	273.504	843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.777	5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.939	24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	31.881	301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1397	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	878	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2227	3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1397	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	878	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2227	3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	62	305

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel UHD Graphics 620	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Pascal
Nom de code	Kaby Lake GT2	GP107
Date de sortie	1 September 2017	25 October 2016
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1380	487
Genre	Laptop	Desktop
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$139
Prix maintenant		$159.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		46.07
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1150 MHz	1392 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	300 MHz	1392 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	24	768
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	3,300 million
Noyaux CUDA		768
Performance á point flottant		2,138 gflops
Température maximale du GPU		97 °C
Taux de remplissage de la texture		66.82 GTexel / s
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Soutien de G-SYNC
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur		145 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires		None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	32 GB	4 GB
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	128 Bit
Genre de mémoire	LPDDR3 / DDR4	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	1	0
Bande passante de la mémoire		112 GB / s
Vitesse de mémoire		7 GB/s
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready