Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel UHD Graphics 620 und NVIDIA GeForce MX150 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 11% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1150 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 16x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 213
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2017 vs 17 May 2017 |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1150 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 213 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- 3.1x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 24
- Etwa 50% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2259 vs 1042
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9584 vs 4592
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 27.062
- Etwa 81% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 vs 273.504
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 1.777
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 19.939
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 31.881
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 1397
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 878
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2227
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 1397
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 878
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2227
- 16.1x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 62
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 937 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 24 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 vs 1042 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 vs 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 vs 27.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 vs 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 vs 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 vs 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 vs 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 vs 62 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 2259 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 213 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 9584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 45.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 495.238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 2.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 38.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 145.794 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 999 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GP108 |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2017 | 17 May 2017 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1380 | 875 |
| Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1150 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 24 | 384 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | 1,800 million |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,127 gflops | |
| Texturfüllrate | 46.98 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop-Größe | large | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Speichertyp | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | 0 |
| Speicherbandbreite | 48.06 GB / s | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
| Quick Sync | ||

