Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 213

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2259 vs 1042
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9584 vs 4592
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 27.062
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 vs 273.504
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 1.777
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 19.939
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 31.881
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2227
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2227
• 16.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 2259
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 213
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 9584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 45.905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 495.238
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 2.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 38.965
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 145.794
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 999

Compare specifications (specs)