NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) und AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 50% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1392 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Etwa 15% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1392 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- 436.3x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,138 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- Etwa 60% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2443
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1674
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2443
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1674
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 25 October 2016 vs 4 August 2016 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1392 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1392 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,138 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 1674 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- 2.1x mehr Texturfüllrate: 137.5 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 2.7x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2048 vs 768
- 942.9x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 6600 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- Etwa 63% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33787 vs 20732
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 vs 75.758
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 843.503
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 vs 5.071
- 4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 24.676
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 vs 301.168
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 8496
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 8496
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 842 vs 305
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 137.5 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 2048 vs 768 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 6600 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33787 vs 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 vs 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 vs 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 vs 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 vs 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 8496 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 vs 305 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 842 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | GP107 | Ellesmere |
Startdatum | 25 October 2016 | 4 August 2016 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $139 | $549.99 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 487 | 488 |
Jetzt kaufen | $159.99 | $109.99 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 46.07 | 91.95 |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1392 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1392 MHz | 926 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 768 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,138 gflops | 4.9 TFLOPs |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 97 °C | |
Leitungssysteme | 768 | 2048 |
Texturfüllrate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 137.5 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,300 million | 5,700 million |
Berechnungseinheiten | 32 | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Länge | 145 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
Überbrückungsfreies CrossFire | ||
Laptop-Größe | large | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 112 GB / s | 211 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7 GB/s | 6600 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |