NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- 5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 vs 34.491
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 10550
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3698
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3343
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 10550
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3698
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3343
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 vs 34.491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 vs 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 vs 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 3343 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Etwa 7% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1582 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- 3x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 vs 151.899
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 vs 1844.67
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 vs 10.683
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 vs 644.054
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1582 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 vs 151.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 vs 1844.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 vs 10.683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 vs 644.054 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7566 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | 255.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | 2621.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | 21.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | 34.491 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | 1376.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3666 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | |
Codename | TU117 | |
Startdatum | 2 Apr 2020 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 273 | 318 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1485 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1350 MHz | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1024 | |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 95.04 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4700 million | |
CUDA-Kerne | 3840 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | DisplayPort, HDMI |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Höhe | 4.4 in | |
Länge | 10.5 in | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 192.0 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 384 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |