NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 versus 34.491
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 versus 10550
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3698
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3343
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 versus 10550
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3698
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3343
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 versus 34.491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 versus 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 versus 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 versus 151.899
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 versus 1844.67
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 versus 10.683
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 versus 644.054
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 versus 151.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 versus 1844.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 versus 10.683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 versus 644.054 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7569 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41946 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | 255.521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | 2621.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | 21.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | 34.491 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | 1376.357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3667 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | |
| Nom de code | TU117 | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 273 | 318 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3840 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | DisplayPort, HDMI |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.4 in | |
| Longeur | 10.5 in | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 384 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
