NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 und AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- 5x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Etwa 34% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1240 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7877 vs 2120
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 576 vs 527
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39331 vs 14676
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.955 vs 40.991
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1294.279 vs 364.578
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.756 vs 3.196
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.78 vs 54.784
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 569.916 vs 262.35
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 3455
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1857
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3107
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 3455
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1857
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3107
- 3x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3595 vs 1201
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 30 April 2019 vs 13 February 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1240 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7877 vs 2120 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 576 vs 527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39331 vs 14676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 vs 40.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 vs 364.578 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 vs 3.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 vs 54.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 vs 262.35 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3107 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3595 vs 1201 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7877 | 2120 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 576 | 527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39331 | 14676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 | 40.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 | 364.578 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 | 3.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 | 54.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 | 262.35 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3107 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3595 | 1201 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Codename | TU107 | Raven |
Startdatum | 30 April 2019 | 13 February 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $179 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 359 | 815 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1240 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1485 MHz | 300 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,760 gflops | |
Leitungssysteme | 704 | |
Texturfüllrate | 55 GTexel / s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4,940 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 1 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8000 MHz | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 |