NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 5x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1240 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7871 vs 2112
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 571 vs 523
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39168 vs 14540
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 135.146 vs 40.991
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1315.075 vs 364.578
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 3.196
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.209 vs 54.784
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 570.245 vs 262.35
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 3455
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3107
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 3455
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3107
• 3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3585 vs 1201

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7871 2112
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	571 523
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39168 14540
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.146 40.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1315.075 364.578
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 3.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	93.209 54.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	570.245 262.35
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3107
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3585 1201

Compare specifications (specs)