NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 10% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1500 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Etwa 5% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- Etwa 33% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 120 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 746
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 133.975
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 22 February 2019 vs 7 January 2019 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 746 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 vs 133.975 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Etwa 17% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 12900
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 61100
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 vs 208.608
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 vs 2573.643
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 vs 16.447
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 vs 926.614
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 16952
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3718
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3355
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 16952
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3718
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3355
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1242 vs 1061
Spezifikationen | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 vs 12900 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 vs 61100 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 vs 208.608 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 vs 2573.643 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 vs 16.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 vs 926.614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 vs 1061 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 | 14119 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 | 71402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1061 | 1242 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU116 | TU106 |
Startdatum | 22 February 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $279 | $349 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 221 | 161 |
Jetzt kaufen | $279.99 | $349.99 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 67.32 | 62.74 |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt | 160 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6,600 million | 10,800 million |
Leitungssysteme | 1920 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 1 | 2 |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 229 mm | 229 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 Bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 |