NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1680 MHz
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 160 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 versus 746
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 133.975
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 versus 7 January 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1680 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 160 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 versus 746 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 133.975 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 versus 12900
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 versus 61100
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 versus 208.608
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 versus 2573.643
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 versus 16.447
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 versus 926.614
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 16952
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3718
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3355
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 16952
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3718
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3355
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1242 versus 1061
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 versus 12900 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 versus 61100 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 versus 208.608 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 versus 2573.643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 versus 16.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 versus 926.614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 versus 1061 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 | 14119 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | 746 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 | 71402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 217.04 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 3119.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 21.707 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 133.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 1141.283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 6714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 6714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1061 | 1242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU116 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $349 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 221 | 161 |
| Prix maintenant | $279.99 | $349.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | 62.74 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 10,800 million |
| Pipelines | 1920 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | 2 |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 229 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
