NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs AMD Radeon RX 560
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 und AMD Radeon RX 560 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 39% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1515 MHz vs 1090-1175 MHz
- Etwa 43% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1710 MHz vs 1200-1275 MHz
- 2.9x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2944 vs 1024
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- 5.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18750 vs 3657
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 908 vs 486
- Etwa 82% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105219 vs 57671
- 5.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 vs 56.81
- 5.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3938.377 vs 775.281
- 6.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 vs 4.602
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 vs 64.428
- 5.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 vs 257.062
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 6571
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3688
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3352
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 6571
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3688
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3352
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 20 September 2018 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1515 MHz vs 1090-1175 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1710 MHz vs 1200-1275 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 2944 vs 1024 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18750 vs 3657 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 908 vs 486 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105219 vs 57671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 vs 56.81 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 vs 775.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 vs 4.602 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 vs 64.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 vs 257.062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3352 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 560
- 2.7x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 60-80 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1774 vs 1752
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60-80 Watt vs 215 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 vs 1752 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | AMD Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18750 | 3657 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 908 | 486 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105219 | 57671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | 56.81 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | 775.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | 4.602 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | 64.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | 257.062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1752 | 1774 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | AMD Radeon RX 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Codename | TU104 | Polaris 21 |
| Startdatum | 20 September 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $699 | $99 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 105 | 513 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $749.99 | $104.99 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 32.34 | 54.35 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1710 MHz | 1200-1275 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1515 MHz | 1090-1175 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 2944 | 1024 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 215 Watt | 60-80 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 13,600 million | 3,000 million |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 14/16 | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 20.40 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 81.60 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Länge | 267 mm | 170 mm |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Überbrückungsfreies CrossFire | ||
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | 128 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 112 GB/s | |
Technologien |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||