NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs AMD Radeon RX 560

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and AMD Radeon RX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1090-1175 MHz
• Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1200-1275 MHz
• 2.9x more pipelines: 2944 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
• 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18751 vs 3657
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 908 vs 487
• Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105156 vs 57671
• 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 vs 56.81
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3938.377 vs 775.281
• 6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 vs 4.602
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 vs 64.428
• 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 vs 257.062
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 6571
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3688
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3352
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 6571
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3688
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3352

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560

• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 60-80 Watt vs 215 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1774 vs 1752

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18751 3657
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	908 487
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	105156 57671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	326.494 56.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3938.377 775.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.684 4.602
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	159.275 64.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1506.874 257.062
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25500 6571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6966 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6293 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25500 6571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6966 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6293 3352
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1752 1774

Compare specifications (specs)