NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile und AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 6 Jahr(e) 8 Monat(e) später
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50663 vs 34598
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 vs 122.268
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1980.866 vs 1890.261
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 vs 10.121
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.641 vs 117.008
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 745.481 vs 625.621
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 9258
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3709
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3351
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 9258
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3709
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3351
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 2021 vs 15 October 2018 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 vs 34598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 vs 122.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 vs 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 vs 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 vs 117.008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 vs 625.621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 3351 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Etwa 64% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1168 MHz vs 712 MHz
- Etwa 21% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1284 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- 4.7x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7657 vs 6831
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 403
- 2x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 849 vs 421
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1168 MHz vs 712 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1284 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 vs 6831 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 403 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 vs 421 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 | 7657 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 | 34598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 122.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 117.008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 625.621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 849 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | GA107 | Polaris 20 |
Startdatum | 2021 | 15 October 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 248 | 358 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1057 MHz | 1284 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 712 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 2048 | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 67.65 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,700 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1x 8-pin |
Breite | IGP | |
Länge | 241 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 192 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 7000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 |