NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 50663 versus 34598
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 versus 122.268
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1980.866 versus 1890.261
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 versus 10.121
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.641 versus 117.008
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 745.481 versus 625.621
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 versus 9258
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 versus 3709
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 versus 3351
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 versus 9258
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 versus 3709
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 versus 3351
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2021 versus 15 October 2018 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 versus 34598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 versus 122.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 versus 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 versus 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 versus 117.008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 versus 625.621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Environ 64% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1168 MHz versus 712 MHz
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1284 MHz versus 1057 MHz
- 4.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7657 versus 6831
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 versus 403
- 2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 849 versus 421
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz versus 712 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz versus 1057 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 versus 6831 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 versus 403 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 versus 421 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 | 7657 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 | 34598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 122.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 117.008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 625.621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 849 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | GA107 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 2021 | 15 October 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 248 | 358 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1057 MHz | 1284 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 712 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.65 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | IGP | |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 7000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |