NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- 2.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3717
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3356
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3717
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3356
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 3356 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Etwa 85% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1320 MHz vs 712 MHz
- Etwa 68% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1777 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- 2.9x mehr Texturfüllrate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
- Etwa 75% höhere Leitungssysteme: 3584 vs 2048
- 3x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Etwa 25% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 6831
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 403
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 50663
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 165.993
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 1980.866
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 14.641
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 135.641
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 745.481
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 15760
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 15760
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 vs 421
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1320 MHz vs 712 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1777 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 3584 vs 2048 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 6831 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 50663 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 165.993 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 vs 1980.866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 vs 14.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 135.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 vs 745.481 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 15760 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 15760 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 vs 421 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 | 17107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 971 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 | 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 299.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 4021.382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 28.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 188.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 1961 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA107 | GA106 |
Startdatum | 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 248 | 134 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $329 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1057 MHz | 1777 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 712 MHz | 1320 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 2048 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 67.65 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | 170 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13250 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | IGP | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 192 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 192 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |