NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3356
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 712 MHz
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 6831
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 403
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 50663
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 165.993
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 1980.866
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 14.641
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 135.641
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 745.481
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 15760
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 15760
- 4.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 vs 421
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 712 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 6831 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 50663 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 165.993 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 vs 1980.866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 vs 14.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 135.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 vs 745.481 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 15760 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 15760 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 vs 421 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 | 17107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 971 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 | 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 299.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 4021.382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 28.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 188.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 1961 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA107 | GA106 |
Launch date | 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 248 | 134 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz | 1777 MHz |
Core clock speed | 712 MHz | 1320 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Width | IGP | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |