NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 170 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 versus 3356
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 versus 3356
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2021 versus 12 Jan 2021 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 170 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Environ 85% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1320 MHz versus 712 MHz
- Environ 68% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1777 MHz versus 1057 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 199.0 GTexel/s versus 67.65 GTexel/s
- Environ 75% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2048
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 versus 6831
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 versus 403
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 versus 50663
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 versus 165.993
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 versus 1980.866
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 versus 14.641
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 versus 135.641
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 versus 745.481
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 versus 15760
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 versus 15760
- 4.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 versus 421
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz versus 712 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz versus 1057 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s versus 67.65 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 2048 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 versus 6831 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 versus 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 versus 50663 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 versus 165.993 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 versus 1980.866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 versus 14.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 versus 135.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 versus 745.481 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 versus 15760 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 versus 15760 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 versus 421 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 | 17107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 971 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 | 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 299.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 4021.382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 28.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 188.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 1961 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA107 | GA106 |
Date de sortie | 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 248 | 134 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1057 MHz | 1777 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 712 MHz | 1320 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.65 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 170 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13250 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | IGP | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |