NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 und NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 6 Jahr(e) 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 57% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1500 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 20799.5x mehr Texturfüllrate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- 30.7x mehr Leitungssysteme: 5888 vs 192
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 1750x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1.8 GB/s
- 35.7x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 623
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 212
- 63.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 1946
- 67.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 6.705
- 57.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 100.391
- 92.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 0.441
- 22.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 8.146
- 80.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 20.64
- 32.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 977
- 9.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 1494
- 17.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 1833
- 32.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 977
- 9.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 1494
- 17.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 1833
- 16.5x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 192
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 vs 27 March 2014 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 vs 192 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 vs 192 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- 11.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 19 Watt vs 220 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 192 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Kepler 2.0 |
Codename | GA104 | GK208B |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 | 27 March 2014 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $499 | $34.99 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 44 | 1488 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $34.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz | 954 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 220 Watt | 19 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 292 million |
CUDA-Kerne | 192 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 366.3 gflops | |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 95 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Höhe | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2.713" (6.9 cm) |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Länge | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | None |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1.8 GB/s |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |