NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 5 mois plus tard
Environ 57% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 954 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
30.7x plus de pipelines: 5888 versus 192
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
1750x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1.8 GB/s
35.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 623
4.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 212
63.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 1946
67.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 6.705
57.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 100.391
92.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 0.441
22.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 8.146
80.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 20.64
32.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 977
9.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 1494
17.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 1833
32.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 977
9.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 1494
17.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 1833
16.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 192

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	1 Sep 2020 versus 27 March 2014
Vitesse du noyau	1500 MHz versus 954 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	317.4 GTexel/s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
Pipelines	5888 versus 192
Processus de fabrication	8 nm versus 28 nm
Taille de mémore maximale	8 GB versus 2 GB
Vitesse de mémoire	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1.8 GB/s
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	22253 versus 623
PassMark - G2D Mark	999 versus 212
Geekbench - OpenCL	123479 versus 1946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	453.922 versus 6.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	5803.174 versus 100.391
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	40.757 versus 0.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	182.055 versus 8.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1664.554 versus 20.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	31716 versus 977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	13566 versus 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	31930 versus 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	31716 versus 977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	13566 versus 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	31930 versus 1833
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3163 versus 192

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

11.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 220 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	19 Watt versus 220 Watt

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

22253

623

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

999

212

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

123479

1946

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

453.922

6.705

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5803.174

100.391

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.757

0.441

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

182.055

8.146

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1664.554

20.64

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31716

977

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13566

1494

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31930

1833

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31716

977

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13566

1494

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31930

1833

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3163

192

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark	22253	623
PassMark - G2D Mark	999	212
Geekbench - OpenCL	123479	1946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	453.922	6.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	5803.174	100.391
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	40.757	0.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	182.055	8.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1664.554	20.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	31716	977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	13566	1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	31930	1833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	31716	977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	13566	1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	31930	1833
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3163	192

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Essentiel
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler 2.0
Nom de code	GA104	GK208B
Date de sortie	1 Sep 2020	27 March 2014
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$499	$34.99
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	44	1488
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Prix maintenant		$34.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		23.15
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1500 MHz	954 MHz
Processus de fabrication	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	317.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	20.31 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	20.31 TFLOPS
Pipelines	5888	192
Pixel fill rate	165.6 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	317.4 GTexel/s	15.26 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	220 Watt	19 Watt
Compte de transistor	17400 million	292 million
Noyaux CUDA		192
Performance á point flottant		366.3 gflops
Température maximale du GPU		95 °C
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI		Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale		2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Facteur de forme	Dual-slot
Hauteur	112 mm (4.4 inches)	2.713" (6.9 cm)
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x8
Longeur	242 mm, 9.5 inches	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	550 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 12-pin	None
Largeur	112 mm, 4.4 inches
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 2.0
Soutien API
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	8 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	448.0 GB/s	14.4 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 bit	64 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective	1.8 GB/s
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	DDR3
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
PhysX
PureVideo