NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 5% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 1507.1x mehr Texturfüllrate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- 2.9x mehr Leitungssysteme: 5888 vs 2048
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 218.8x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 10465
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 603
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 47476
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 150.951
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 1718.593
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 12.283
- 6.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 28.289
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 710.366
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 13765
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3691
- 9.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3340
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 13765
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3691
- 9.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3340
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 vs 15 August 2016 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 vs 2048 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 10465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 603 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3340 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Etwa 47% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 150 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5536 vs 3163
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1506 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5536 vs 3163 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 10465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 603 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 5536 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Pascal |
Codename | GA104 | GP104B |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 | 15 August 2016 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $499 | $389.99 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 44 | 290 |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Jetzt kaufen | $359.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 220 Watt | 150 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA-Kerne | 1920 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 6,738 gflops | |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 94 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Höhe | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop-Größe | large | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448.0 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8 GB/s |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtuelle Realität | ||
VR Ready |