NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 1507.1x more texture fill rate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 218.8x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 10465
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 603
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 47476
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 150.951
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 1718.593
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 12.283
- 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 28.289
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 710.366
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 13765
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3691
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3340
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 13765
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3691
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3340
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 15 August 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 10465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 603 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 75% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5536 vs 3163
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5536 vs 3163 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 10465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 603 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 5536 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP104B |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 15 August 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $389.99 |
Place in performance rating | 44 | 290 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 317.4 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |