NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 2% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- 1240.8x mehr Texturfüllrate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- 2.4x mehr Leitungssysteme: 5888 vs 2432
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 14696
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 876
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 55424
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 182.11
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 1797.792
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 14.071
- 6.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 26.444
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 1035.984
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 16128
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3638
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3344
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 16128
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3638
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3344
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 1471
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 vs 2 November 2017 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 vs 2432 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 vs 1471 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Etwa 7% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1607 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Etwa 22% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 180 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 4.6x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1607 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 1471 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Pascal |
Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 | 2 November 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $499 | $399 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 44 | 250 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $379.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 220 Watt | 180 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 8,186 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Höhe | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |