NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1683 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 5888 versus 2432
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 14696
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 876
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 55424
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 182.11
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 1797.792
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 14.071
- 6.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 26.444
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 1035.984
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 16128
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3638
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3344
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 16128
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3638
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3344
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 1471
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 2 November 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1683 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5888 versus 2432 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 versus 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 versus 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 versus 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 versus 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 versus 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 versus 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 versus 1471 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 220 Watt
- 4.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 1471 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 2 November 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 44 | 250 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 8,186 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |