NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- 1240.8x more texture fill rate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2432
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 14696
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 876
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 55424
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 182.11
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 1797.792
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 14.071
- 6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 26.444
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 1035.984
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 16128
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3638
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3344
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 16128
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3638
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3344
- 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 1471
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 2 November 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 2432 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 vs 1471 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 1471 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 2 November 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 44 | 250 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 317.4 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |