NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz
  • 1240.8x more texture fill rate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
  • 2.4x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2432
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 14696
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 876
  • 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 55424
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 182.11
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 1797.792
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 14.071
  • 6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 26.444
  • Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 1035.984
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 16128
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3638
  • 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3344
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 16128
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3638
  • 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3344
  • 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 1471
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 Sep 2020 vs 2 November 2017
Boost clock speed 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz
Texture fill rate 317.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 5888 vs 2432
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 16 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 22253 vs 14696
PassMark - G2D Mark 999 vs 876
Geekbench - OpenCL 123479 vs 55424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 453.922 vs 182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 5803.174 vs 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 40.757 vs 14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 182.055 vs 26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1664.554 vs 1035.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 31716 vs 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 13566 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 31930 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 31716 vs 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 13566 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 31930 vs 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3163 vs 1471

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1500 MHz
  • Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 220 Watt
  • 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed 1607 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 180 Watt vs 220 Watt
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
22253
14696
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
999
876
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
123479
55424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
453.922
182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5803.174
1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
40.757
14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
182.055
26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1664.554
1035.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31716
16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13566
3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31930
3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31716
16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13566
3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31930
3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3163
1471
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark 22253 14696
PassMark - G2D Mark 999 876
Geekbench - OpenCL 123479 55424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 453.922 182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 5803.174 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 40.757 14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 182.055 26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1664.554 1035.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 31716 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 13566 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 31930 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 31716 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 13566 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 31930 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3163 1471

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Pascal
Code name GA104 GP104
Launch date 1 Sep 2020 2 November 2017
Launch price (MSRP) $499 $399
Place in performance rating 44 250
Type Desktop Desktop
Price now $379.99
Value for money (0-100) 44.74

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1725 MHz 1683 MHz
Core clock speed 1500 MHz 1607 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 20.31 TFLOPS
Pipelines 5888 2432
Pixel fill rate 165.6 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 317.4 GTexel/s 255.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 220 Watt 180 Watt
Transistor count 17400 million 7,200 million
Floating-point performance 8,186 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot
Height 112 mm (4.4 inches)
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 242 mm, 9.5 inches 267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 12-pin 1x 8-pin
Width 112 mm, 4.4 inches

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448.0 GB/s 256.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective 8008 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready