NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 10 Monat(e) später
- 2x mehr Texturfüllrate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
- 4.2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 5888 vs 1408
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Um etwa 33% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 12712
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 804
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 62641
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 187.131
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 2548.187
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 15.882
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 117.673
- Etwa 85% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 901.388
- Etwa 78% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 17812
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3717
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3351
- Etwa 78% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 17812
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3717
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3351
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 1278
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 vs 29 Oct 2019 |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 vs 1408 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 12712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 804 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 62641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 vs 1278 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Etwa 2% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1530 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Etwa 3% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1785 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Etwa 76% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 125 Watt vs 220 Watt
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 12712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 804 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 62641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 1278 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Turing |
Codename | GA104 | TU116 |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 | 29 Oct 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $499 | $229 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 44 | 223 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 220 Watt | 125 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 6600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Höhe | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 9 inches (229 mm) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | 350 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | Dual-slot |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448.0 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |