NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 157.1 GTexel/s
- 4.2x plus de pipelines: 5888 versus 1408
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 12712
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 804
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 62641
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 187.131
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 2548.187
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 15.882
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 117.673
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 901.388
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 17812
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3717
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3351
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 17812
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3717
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3351
- 2.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 1278
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 29 Oct 2019 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s versus 157.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5888 versus 1408 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 versus 12712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 804 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 versus 62641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 versus 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 versus 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 versus 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 versus 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 versus 1278 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- Environ 76% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 220 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 12712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 804 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 62641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 1278 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU116 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 29 Oct 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 44 | 223 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5888 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 125 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 6600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 9 inches (229 mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 350 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | Dual-slot |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |