NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Etwa 20% höhere Texturfüllrate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s
- Etwa 21% höhere Leitungssysteme: 10496 vs 8704
- 2.4x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 24 GB vs 10 GB
- Etwa 3% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26818 vs 25320
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 1041
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 vs 168014
- Etwa 60% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 457.414
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 6022.79
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 51.221
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 175.219
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 2381.93
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19875 vs 17705
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 10496 vs 8704 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 24 GB vs 10 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26818 vs 25320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 vs 1041 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 vs 168014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 vs 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 vs 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 vs 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 2381.93 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19875 vs 17705 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Etwa 3% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1440 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Etwa 1% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Etwa 9% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 320 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 33398
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 33398
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 320 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3354 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26818 | 25320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 1041 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 | 168014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19875 | 17705 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA102 | GA102 |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $1499 | $699 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 40 | 52 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1395 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 10496 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 350 Watt | 320 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 750 Watt | 700 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | Triple-slot | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 24 GB | 10 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 936.2 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 320 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |