NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 556.0 GTexel/s versus 465.1 GTexel/s
- Environ 21% de pipelines plus haut: 10496 versus 8704
- 2.4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 10 GB
- Environ 3% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26818 versus 25320
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 versus 1041
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 versus 168014
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 versus 457.414
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 6022.79
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 versus 51.221
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 versus 175.219
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 2381.93
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19875 versus 17705
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s versus 465.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 versus 8704 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 10 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26818 versus 25320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 versus 1041 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 versus 168014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 versus 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 versus 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 versus 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 versus 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 versus 2381.93 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19875 versus 17705 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1395 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1695 MHz
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 320 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 versus 33398
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 versus 33398
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1395 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1695 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 versus 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 versus 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3354 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26818 | 25320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 1041 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 | 168014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19875 | 17705 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA102 | GA102 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1499 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 40 | 52 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10496 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 320 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | 700 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | Triple-slot | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | 10 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 936.2 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 320 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |