NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s
- Around 21% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 8704
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 25146
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 1053
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 167014
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 457.414
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 6022.79
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 vs 51.221
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 175.219
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 2381.93
- Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5118 vs 4420
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10496 vs 8704 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 10 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 vs 25146 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 1053 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 vs 167014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 vs 457.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 6022.79 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 vs 51.221 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 vs 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 2381.93 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 vs 4420 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 320 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 33398
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 33398
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 | 25146 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 1053 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | 167014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | 457.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 6022.79 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | 51.221 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 2381.93 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 34537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 34537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 | 4420 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Code name | GA102 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 46 | 56 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10496 | 8704 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 320 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | Triple-slot | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 10 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 320 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
