NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s
- Around 21% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 8704
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26815 vs 25320
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 1041
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 vs 167693
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 457.414
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 6022.79
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 51.221
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 175.219
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 2381.93
- Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19877 vs 17706
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10496 vs 8704 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 10 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26815 vs 25320 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 vs 1041 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 vs 167693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 vs 457.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 6022.79 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 vs 51.221 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 vs 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 2381.93 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19877 vs 17706 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 320 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 33398
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 33398
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26815 | 25320 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 1041 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 | 167693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | 457.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 6022.79 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | 51.221 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 2381.93 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 34537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 34537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19877 | 17706 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Code name | GA102 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 40 | 52 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10496 | 8704 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 320 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | Triple-slot | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 10 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 320 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIATesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIARTX A4500
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700 XT
