NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s
- Around 21% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 8704
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective)
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25414 vs 24121
- Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19902 vs 17698
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205482 vs 181222
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 8704 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 10 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25414 vs 24121 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19902 vs 17698 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 205482 vs 181222 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 320 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 995 vs 981
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 995 vs 981 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 981 | 995 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25414 | 24121 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19902 | 17698 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 205482 | 181222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 582.401 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6745.122 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 53.526 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 176.953 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1961.892 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 32801 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 32801 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA102 | GA102 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 1 | 6 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10496 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 320 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 285 mm (11.2 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 10 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 320 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |