NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s
- Around 21% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 8704
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective)
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25717 vs 24310
- Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19930 vs 17704
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205218 vs 181021
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10496 vs 8704 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 10 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25717 vs 24310 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19930 vs 17704 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 205218 vs 181021 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 320 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 998 vs 983
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 998 vs 983 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 983 | 998 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25717 | 24310 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19930 | 17704 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 205218 | 181021 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 582.401 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6745.122 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 53.526 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 176.953 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1961.892 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 32782 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8049 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 32782 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8049 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Code name | GA102 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 1 | 4 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10496 | 8704 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 320 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 285 mm (11.2 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 10 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 320 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIATITAN V CEO Edition
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT
