NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro P520 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Etwa 14% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1485 MHz vs 1303 MHz
- Etwa 12% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Etwa 33% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 237
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 2091
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 7960
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 3527
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 3527
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3566
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3566
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2295
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2295
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1485 MHz vs 1303 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 237 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 vs 2091 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 7960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 3527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 3527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2295 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 | 564 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2091 | 7881 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7960 | 39165 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2295 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2295 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Pascal | Turing |
| Codename | GP108 | TU107 |
| Startdatum | 27 May 2019 | 30 April 2019 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 758 | 376 |
| Typ | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1493 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1303 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 23.89 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.94 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 764.4 GFLOPS | |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.89 GPixel/s | |
| Texturfüllrate | 23.89 GTexel/s | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 1800 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
| DisplayPort Anzahl | 1 | |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Höhe | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop-Größe | large | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 40.10 GB/s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 6000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Technologien |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche NVIDIA Quadro P520 mit anderen
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
ATIRadeon X300 SE
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAT600
