NVIDIA Quadro P520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 1303 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1493 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 6000 MHz
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 237
- 3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 2091
- 4.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 7960
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 3527
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 3527
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3566
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3566
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2295
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2295
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 1303 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1493 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 6000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 237 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 2091 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 7960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 3527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 3527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 2295 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 | 564 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2091 | 7881 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7960 | 39165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 | 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 | 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2295 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2295 | 3358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
Nom de code | GP108 | TU107 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 30 April 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 758 | 376 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1303 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 23.89 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.94 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 764.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Pixel fill rate | 23.89 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.89 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 1800 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.10 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor |