NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Tesla P40
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 und NVIDIA Tesla P40 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 7% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1395 MHz vs 1303 MHz
- Etwa 11% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1695 MHz vs 1531 MHz
- 1513.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 367.4 GTexel / s
- 2.7x mehr Leitungssysteme: 10496 vs 3840
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 12267
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 439
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 62287
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 300.355
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 3559.383
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 vs 19.757
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 204.32
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1214.142
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 9538
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 9538
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 vs 13 September 2016 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1395 MHz vs 1303 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz vs 1531 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 367.4 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 10496 vs 3840 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 vs 12267 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 439 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 vs 62287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 vs 300.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 3559.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 vs 19.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 vs 204.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3340 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Etwa 40% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 8.2x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 10008 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 10008 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 | 12267 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 439 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | 62287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | 300.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 3559.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | 19.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | 204.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Pascal |
Codename | GA102 | GP102 |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 | 13 September 2016 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $1499 | $5,699 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 46 | 234 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1395 MHz | 1303 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 10496 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 11,800 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 11,758 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 267 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Breite | Triple-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 936.2 GB/s | 480.4 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 384 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 10008 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR5X |