NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 versus NVIDIA Tesla P40
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Tesla P40 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1303 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1531 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 556.0 GTexel/s versus 367.4 GTexel / s
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 10496 versus 3840
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 versus 12267
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 versus 439
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 versus 62287
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 versus 300.355
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 3559.383
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 versus 19.757
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 versus 204.32
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 1214.142
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 9538
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 9538
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 13 September 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1303 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1531 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s versus 367.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 10496 versus 3840 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 versus 12267 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 versus 439 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 versus 62287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 versus 300.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 versus 3559.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 versus 19.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 versus 204.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 versus 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 versus 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 versus 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 8.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10008 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10008 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 | 12267 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 439 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | 62287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | 300.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 3559.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | 19.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | 204.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA102 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 13 September 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1499 | $5,699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 46 | 234 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1303 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10496 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 11,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 11,758 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Triple-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 936.2 GB/s | 480.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 10008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR5X |