AMD C-50 vs AMD Turion 64 ML-28

Comparative analysis of AMD C-50 and AMD Turion 64 ML-28 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD C-50

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 90 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 261 vs 254

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 ML-28

• Around 60% higher clock speed: 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 314 vs 309

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD C-50
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 ML-28

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	309 314
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	261 254

Compare specifications (specs)