AMD C-50 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
Comparative analysis of AMD C-50 and Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD C-50
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 45 nm
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.444 vs 0.226
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.288 vs 0.387
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.042 vs 1.639
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 November 2010 vs 10 January 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.444 vs 0.226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.288 vs 0.387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.042 vs 1.639 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
- Around 130% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 1 GHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 899 vs 308
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 834 vs 258
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 272 vs 85
- 3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 474 vs 158
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7.743 vs 2.303
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.058 vs 0.033
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz vs 1 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 899 vs 308 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 834 vs 258 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 272 vs 85 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 474 vs 158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.743 vs 2.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.058 vs 0.033 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD C-50
CPU 2: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD C-50 | Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 308 | 899 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 258 | 834 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 85 | 272 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 158 | 474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.444 | 0.226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.303 | 7.743 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.033 | 0.058 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.288 | 0.387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.042 | 1.639 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 150 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1102 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 150 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1102 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD C-50 | Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Ontario | Penryn |
Launch date | 9 November 2010 | 10 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 3247 | 3238 |
Series | AMD C-Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Mobile |
Processor Number | T4500 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 75 mm | 107 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Base frequency | 2.30 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
Transistor count | 410 million | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | PGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | 35 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring |