AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D300 and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 651 MHz
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 68 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
- Around 63% better floating-point performance: 2,176 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 204 Watt
- Around 49% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 3404 MHz
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.183 vs 32.699
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1192.547 vs 1142.156
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.209 vs 3.796
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.541 vs 51.693
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 242.179 vs 110.277
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 2 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 651 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 68 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,176 gflops vs 1,332 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 3404 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 vs 32.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 vs 1142.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 vs 3.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 vs 51.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 vs 110.277 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3397
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3397
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D300
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro D300 | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20101 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 | 32.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 | 1142.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 | 3.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 | 51.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 | 110.277 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6054 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3397 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6054 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3397 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro D300 | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Pitcairn | GF110 |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 2 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 704 | 707 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $14,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 651 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,176 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 68 GTexel / s | 41.66 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 204 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm | 248 mm |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 162.6 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 3404 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |