AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S7150 and AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 91% higher texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 896
- Around 91% better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3770 vs 3048
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 vs 971
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 vs 971
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2016 vs 21 December 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops vs 1,971 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3770 vs 3048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 vs 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 vs 971 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 508 vs 414
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1980 vs 583
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1980 vs 583
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 vs 414 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1980 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1980 vs 583 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S7150 | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3770 | 3048 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 | 508 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27136 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 | 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 583 | 1980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 | 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 583 | 1980 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S7150 | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Bonaire |
Launch date | 1 February 2016 | 21 December 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | |
Place in performance rating | 657 | 659 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 183 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 104.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |