AMD FirePro S7150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S7150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 49.4 billion / sec
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1792 vs 512
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 244 Watt
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
- Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27025 vs 15038
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6147 vs 5953
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 vs 3717
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6147 vs 5953
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 vs 3717
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2016 vs 9 November 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s vs 49.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 244 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27025 vs 15038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 vs 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 vs 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 vs 3717 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4614 vs 3770
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 477 vs 414
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.048 vs 27.544
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 872.651 vs 570.969
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.338 vs 0.687
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.378 vs 23.637
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 583
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 583
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4614 vs 3770 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 477 vs 414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 vs 27.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 vs 570.969 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 vs 0.687 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.378 vs 23.637 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 583 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S7150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3770 | 4614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 | 477 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27025 | 15038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | 40.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | 872.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | 4.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 | 32.378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 583 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 583 | 3357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S7150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Tonga | GF110 |
Launch date | 1 February 2016 | 9 November 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 655 | 657 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $289.88 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1544 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 244 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | One 6-pin and One 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |