AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S9050 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 776 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s
- 6.2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 288
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 894.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 3828 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4901 vs 2006
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 1914
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 1914
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 776 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 288 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops vs 894.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 3828 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4901 vs 2006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 vs 1914 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 vs 1914 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 102 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 443 vs 369
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 102 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 443 vs 369 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S9050
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S9050 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4901 | 2006 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 369 | 443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 | 1914 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S9050 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | GF114 |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 362 | 557 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 776 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 894.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s | 37.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 102 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 254 mm | 210 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB / s | 91.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 3828 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |