AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S9050 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 7.8x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 13 billion / sec
- 28x more pipelines: 1792 vs 64
- 25.2x better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 128 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 1 GB
- 9.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4901 vs 504
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 vs 3 March 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s vs 13 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops vs 128 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4901 vs 504 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 vs 369
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 vs 369 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S9050
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S9050 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4901 | 504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 369 | 407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S9050 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Tahiti | G94 |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 373 | 375 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 128 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s | 13 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Gigaflops | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB / s | 51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |